Elicit is an AI research assistant that finds, summarizes, and extracts data from academic papers to accelerate literature reviews.
Elicit automates the tedious parts of systematic research. Ask a research question and Elicit searches a corpus of 125+ million academic papers, returning relevant studies summarized in structured tables. Its workflows can screen papers against inclusion criteria, extract details about methods, samples, and outcomes into data tables, and synthesize findings across studies. Because Elicit shows the source paper for every claim, researchers can verify answers rather than trusting a black box, making it suitable for rigorous evidence reviews. The workflow concept mirrors systematic review methodology, which is why research teams trust it for evidence work rather than casual summarization. Extraction tables can be customized to the fields a project cares about, from effect sizes to study limitations. Everything stays traceable to source papers, an essential property for academic credibility.
Elicit is freemium. A free tier allows a limited number of searches and summaries, while paid plans add unlimited workflows, batch data extraction, and PDF uploads at pricing suitable for individual researchers, with lab and enterprise options available. Lab plans aggregate usage for research groups, and individual subscriptions are priced below the cost of a few hours of manual screening.
Elicit is for graduate students, researchers, and evidence-synthesis teams conducting literature reviews and meta-analyses who need to process more papers than they can read manually. Evidence teams in healthcare and policy organizations use it to accelerate formal reviews and briefings.
Yes, a free tier with monthly limits exists; paid plans unlock unlimited searches, extraction workflows, and PDF uploads. The free tier is genuinely useful for exploring research questions before committing to paid workflows.
Elicit provides programmatic options for institutions and teams; individual use centers on the web research workspace. Institutional options support programmatic and bulk access for organizations with heavy research loads.
Elicit emphasizes structured evidence extraction, while Consensus focuses on quick answer polling and SciSpace on reading assistance. Elicit is the workflow choice for evidence synthesis; Consensus is the faster choice for single-question verdicts.
Kimi is Moonshot AI's long-context assistant, built for reading entire books and document sets, with strong Chinese and English research support. OverviewKimi,…
Metaso is a Chinese AI search engine that delivers structured, ad-free research answers with outlines, mind maps, and full source citations. OverviewMetaso,…
Consensus is an AI-powered academic search engine that answers research questions with evidence from 200+ million peer-reviewed papers. OverviewConsensus turns research questions…